|Front page, the Toronto Star, February 11, 1990. Click on image for larger version.|
|Advertisement, Now, May 29, 1986.|
Also controversial was an anti-apartheid conference organized by the Toronto Board of Education in March 1986. Within the board, some trustees were uneasy about holding a conference based around the issue. Worried that the event would portray "whites as racists," trustee Nola Crewe was bothered about "teaching our children that it's only white people who do these things." Alternately, fellow trustee Fran Endicott criticized board chair Ann Vanstone for allowing a letter from South African ambassador Glenn Babb onto the board's agenda. Babb demanded equal time to present his government's point of view, hoping at a minimum the board would show a pro-government film. The board rightly refused to recognize the letter. Over the next two years, the left and right wings of the board battled over the content of similar conferences.
|Source: the Toronto Sun, May 23, 1986. Click on image for larger version.|
On the other hand, there was veteran red-fighter Lubor J. Zink, who worried about the Marxist influences within the African National Congress.
It also bears repetition that the jailed ANC leader Nelson Mandela, whom western trendy lemmings have elevated to a saintly hero, is a self-confessed terroritst and author of a How to be a Good Communist statement which proclaims that "The enemy must be completely crushed and wiped out from the face of the earth before a communist world can be realized." What room does such dedication to delivery of South Africa into the Soviet orbit leave for other than surrender negotiations with the ANC?
Like other observers at the time, Zink worried a sudden collapse of the apartheid regime and its replacement with the ANC would be catastrophic to all South Africans. Though time proved a degree of paranoia, I suspect contemporary examples of wars in Angola and Mozambique didn't ease the minds of right-leaning writers. Reading such pieces makes one appreciate the steadying, calming influence Mandela brought after his release, proving his naysayers wrong on certain points.
I won't venture into the defense of the apartheid regime which periodically emerged from gadfly Sun columnist Mackenzie Porter. Some things are best left to decay on microfilm.
|Excerpt, front page of the Toronto Star, June 19, 1990.|
|Editorial, the Globe and Mail, June 18, 1990.|
|Source: the Toronto Sun, June 19, 1990. Click on image for larger version.|
Compare that to Star columnist Frank Jones's assessment of Mandela's visit: "You didn't have to be black to rejoice. His survival and, we hope and pray, the tearing down of apartheid barriers in South Africa, are victories that should be sweet to us all."
|Photo by Stan Behal, the Toronto Sun, June 19, 1990.|
Black people in South Africa want to control their own education and the government is not prepared to concede. They are also demanding one educational system with no distinction between black and white education and the government is resisting that demand, too.Additional material from the June 21-27, 1990 edition of Now, the November 22, 1985, November 27, 1985, March 7, 1986, and June 21, 1990 editions of the Toronto Star, and the May 23, 1986, June 20, 1990, and June 22, 1990 editions of the Toronto Sun.
Many students now don't even go to school and this is very regrettable because if our children don't go to school, this means they won't be able to fulfil their roles as future leaders.
Police have been going to the homes of students, arresting and assaulting them and confiscating their books. They are only demanding a better education and better school facilities, but it is difficult to understand the manner in which the police are reacting even when you make the allowance that we are dealing with a rather brutal community which has never known the art of addressing the concerns of the black community in a peaceful way.